It was a quote from a set of cards my ex husband had given to me . The cards feature quotes from the greek philosopher Heraclitus and are supposed to be used to help get writers through the difficult parts of their projects, but I have found the thirty quotes useful in everyday life as well, particularly the quote on card number twenty five.
Every walking animal is driven to its purpose with a whack.I tried to share the meaning of the quote with the group but no one seemed to understand what I was saying and I was actually accused of delivering a violent message. An experience that left me scratching my head and wondering what the fuck I'd just witnessed. Perhaps I simply failed to articulate my point well enough for anyone other than myself to understand. Or maybe it was a message that particular group of women couldn't grasp.
The message?
Pain, Struggle and Consequences are necessary aspects of life. Discomfort or the fear of discomfort drives us to act rather being acted on. Taking action gives us control, and control gives us power. likewise the removed potential for discomfort steals from us our motivation and subsequently our power.
It occurs to me now that I at that time was speaking to a group of women who regularly complained that not enough was being done for them while responsibility for all of their basic necessities were being entirely assumed by others. Food, clothing, medication, therapy, legal advice, transportation, piano lessons for their children and advocacy services, et cetera all provided free of charge to them. It seemed completely irrational to me. Then I realized that they were also greatly limited by the rules of the people taking care of them.
They had very little responsibility and very much control exercised over them. It seemed to me that they wanted to be provided not only their needs but their wants, any amount of labor necessary to improve their condition as well as freedom from any limitations. These were women who wanted to feel no pain, no discomfort and subsequently no motivation to establish their personal power along with its accompanying risks and consequences.
As far as I could tell none of them realized that the amount of responsibility assumed for them by others was the product purchased by the amount of discomfort they experience due the limitations placed on them by the people providing for them. My judgement of them being irrational was an understatement, it was delusion.
If one is relived of ANY single responsibility in any area of life, one is also relieved of the consequences that come with failure to rise to that responsibility and that sounds good until one considers that one is also relieved of power and control in that area. Many responsibilities relieved equals Much power taken.
If some one else solves your problems for you, some one else has control over you.
Externalizing your responsibilities and consequences Externalizes your Power.
This is why the most Powerful, Motivated, and Responsible people are very often people who have struggled and have suffered serious consequences in the past. If you know pain and struggle you are more likely to take measures to avoid it in the future. You are more likely to take control of your life and are thus empowered by the potential of suffering. You are driven to purpose.
No whack, no motivation, no purpose.
A person with out motivation has an increased risk of being and inactive passenger in his or her own life. An inactive person is an object and an object has no power. I don't think they realized it but the women in this group were angered because they were not being allowed to become objects by the removal of all responsibility, accountability and potential for discomfort.
Now, allow me to explain the dynamics of this group. There were almost an even number of women who were abused but not (to the best of my knowledge) abusive , women who were abused but were also abusive and one or two whom I am almost positive were never abused at all. For the most part, they as a group, seemed to be under the impression that they had in one way or another suffered enough and had come to feel entitled to an unreasonable amount of comfort without the restrictions that come with being provided for or the labor and responsibility that comes with providing for yourself.
Rather than being treated like children, they wanted to be treated as objects.
They did not want to process their painful experiences in a way that would provide motivation to act and improve their circumstances, which would lead empowerment. They, instead behaved as if their 'whack' was a consequence to trump all consequences and they should endure no further responsibility and subsequently no future consequences.
This seems to me an attempt to cling to victim-hood and its compensatory benefits. Rather than allowing their survival to motivate them gain control of their lives. Since my experience in that support group, I can now recognize this attitude in other parts of society; from insignificant internet dramas to the wide-scale abuse of social services.
Attempting to draw benefit from victim-hood rather than integrating the negative experience into motivation to take control to improve things for yourself, is sure to lead to continuous victim identity. in time sympathy for the victim from outsiders wears thin and the victim is expected resume his or her responsibilities and its accompanying consequences. The victim is expected to, at some point, take personal responsibility, which will seem unjust and cruel to one who is deriving a sense or entitlement from their misfortune or abuse.
Which leads to the question, Why aren't they doing more for me??
The answer really is simple: because they want you to be a grown up.